<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urinalysis is warrantess search; Mandatory urine testing as condition of pretrial release is inappropriate as there is no evidence that it increases likelihood of appearance for court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jennifermcooper.com/2008/09/02/urinalysis-is-warrantess-search-inappropriate-condition-of-pretrial-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jennifermcooper.com/2008/09/02/urinalysis-is-warrantess-search-inappropriate-condition-of-pretrial-release/</link>
	<description>Washington State criminal defense, search &#38; seizure, DUI and drug law</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	</channel>
</rss>
